IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/7nby6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fraud Deterrence: The Management’s Intention In Using FCP

Author

Listed:
  • Koerniawan, Koenta Adji

    (Telkom University at Bandung, Indonesia)

  • Afifah, Nunuy Nur
  • Sueb, Memed
  • Suprijadi, Jadi

Abstract

The Indonesian Government Regulation on the Government's Internal Control System (GICS / SPIP) is also applied to the Regional Public Service Bodies of Hospitals (RPSB), but ironically many cases of fraud occur in regional hospitals. Fraud Control Plan (FCP), which is the second layer of reinforcement after GICS, is needed to deter fraud. The concept of fraud deterrence, used in the International Standards on Auditing (ISA), is different from fraud prevention, but both are translated the same today. As a novelty, this study proposes a new definition of fraud deterrence and the D.E.T.E.R.E. This study uses the theory of planned behavior and aims to confirm the relationship between understanding of GICS, attitude towards behavior (ATB), subjective norm (SN), perceived behavioral control (PBC), on management's intention to use FCP to deter fraud and its implications for fraud deterrence. The research sample is 151 management people who work in hospitals. The analysis method uses SEM-Lisrel. The results showed that understanding of GICS and SN had a positive effect on management's intention to use FCP to deter fraud. Management's intention to use FCP to deter fraud has a positive effect on fraud deterrence.

Suggested Citation

  • Koerniawan, Koenta Adji & Afifah, Nunuy Nur & Sueb, Memed & Suprijadi, Jadi, 2022. "Fraud Deterrence: The Management’s Intention In Using FCP," OSF Preprints 7nby6, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7nby6
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7nby6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6571b8ac43d0673173b19e1e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7nby6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7nby6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.