IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/7c5xr_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting the peer reviewers for their contribution to science

Author

Listed:
  • Laxdal, Aron Gauti
  • Haugen, Tommy

    (University of Agder)

Abstract

• The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated. • While it’s unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted. • Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature. • The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects. • We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Laxdal, Aron Gauti & Haugen, Tommy, 2023. "Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting the peer reviewers for their contribution to science," OSF Preprints 7c5xr_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7c5xr_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7c5xr_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/650047a46d1e89584f15179c/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7c5xr_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7c5xr_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.