Author
Listed:
- Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo
- Newall, Philip
(University of Warwick)
- Ranyard, Rob
- Ayton, Peter
- Clacher, Iain
Abstract
Measures of financial literacy are widely used in academic research and also underpin a wide range of governmental policy interventions around the world. Fernandes, Lynch, and Netemeyer created a valid and reliable financial literacy questionnaire in “Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors” which has been widely used and frequently cited. However, we find that ongoing changes to legislation regarding the age at which individuals must start withdrawing from their retirement plans in the US (401k and IRA) have invalidated one of its questions as originally proposed (Question 8). This undermines the validity of the measure and will lead to incorrect usage and misleading inferences if the questionnaire is not updated. We recommend that future researchers exclude this question. We conducted Item Response Theory and comparative analyses across five different datasets covering multiple time points and N=4,959 participants to confirm that the scale remains reliable and measures the same construct without this item. The invalidated question is also specific to the US, and its removal increases the international scope of the measure. We discuss the remaining limitations of this, and similar, financial literacy questionnaires. Despite its limitations, the shorter version of the questionnaire remains a valid scale for measuring financial literacy with an emphasis in investing behavior, with international applicability. Researchers and policy-makers should be aware of the issues raised here when measuring financial literacy or making comparisons across time and across different jurisdictions.
Suggested Citation
Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo & Newall, Philip & Ranyard, Rob & Ayton, Peter & Clacher, Iain, 2025.
"Revalidating Fernandes, Lynch, and Netemeyer’s 2014 financial literacy scale in response to ongoing legislative and behavioral changes,"
OSF Preprints
493x7_v2, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:493x7_v2
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/493x7_v2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:493x7_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.