Author
Abstract
This article advances trust research by theorizing political scandals as moments of rupture where culturally embedded trust cultures, media logics, and populist strategies collide to reshape democratic legitimacy. Moving beyond proceduralist accounts, it conceptualizes trust as a relational, emotional, and historically situated practice—produced and fractured through moral expectations and cultural scripts. Drawing on the Dengvaxia vaccine controversy in the Philippines, the article traces how protective trust cultures centered on children and familial care were activated and amplified by sensational media coverage, transforming a complex public health issue into a national moral scandal. Populist actors strategically seized the moment, reframing the controversy as elite betrayal and recasting themselves as moral protectors of the people. This reconfiguration of trust not only delegitimized institutions but eroded vaccine confidence and deepened political polarization. The case illustrates how, in contexts shaped by relational trust cultures, scandals become existential tests of democratic legitimacy—exposing the limits of technocratic responses and the power of emotional and cultural framings. By foregrounding trust cultures as an analytical lens, the article calls for greater attention to the cultural and emotional dimensions of trust in media-driven democracies, particularly across the Global South where democratic legitimacy remains deeply contested.
Suggested Citation
Mendoza, Karl Patrick Regala, 2025.
"Trust Cultures in Crisis: Scandal, Populism, and the Relational Dynamics of Democratic Legitimacy,"
OSF Preprints
2ye3x_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2ye3x_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2ye3x_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2ye3x_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.