IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/mhwzg_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Very Like a Law Professor: An Essay in Honor of Tom Ulen

Author

Listed:
  • Ayres, Ian

Abstract

This Essay explores the future of law and economics. The author begins by reviewing Tom Ulen’s attempts at predicting the field’s future in 1997 at his lecture “Very Like a Whale.” He then follows Tom Ulen’s idea that law and economics scholars might do well to engage in more “controlled experiments” to make his own set of predictions. His first prediction is that law and economics scholars during the next decade will exploit regression discontinuity to tease out the causal impact of legal rules. Next, he predicts that law and economics scholars will exploit unintended experiments to tease out causal impacts of the law. Finally, the author predicts that law and economics scholars will, with the help of government officials, conduct intentional experiments to tease out causal impacts of the law.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:mhwzg_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mhwzg_v1
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://osf.io/download/67b4a18f3e1ed1d61ea54ae3/
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/mhwzg_v1?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:mhwzg_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.