IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/aerw9_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Responding to Disinformation: Ten Recommendations for Regulatory Action and Forbearance

Author

Listed:
  • Marsden, Christopher T.
  • Brown, Ian
  • Veale, Michael

    (University College London)

Abstract

in Martin Moore & Damian Tambini (eds.) Dealing with Digital Dominance (OUP 2021) 195-220 doi:10.1093/oso/9780197616093.003.0012 This chapter elaborates on challenges and emerging best practices for state regulation of electoral disinformation throughout the electoral cycle. It is based on research for three studies during 2018-20: into election cybersecurity for the Commonwealth (Brown et al. 2020); on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to regulate disinformation for the European Parliament (Marsden & Meyer 2019a; Meyer et al. 2020); and for UNESCO, the United Nations body responsible for education (Kalina et al. 2020). The research covers more than half the world’s nations, and substantially more than half that population, and in 2019 the two largest democratic elections in history: India’s general election and the European Parliamentary elections.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:aerw9_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/aerw9_v1
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://osf.io/download/5fae844a80ff8e014f8d970f/
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/aerw9_v1?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:aerw9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.