Author
Abstract
Corruption, mismanagement and incompetence are perceived as a significant prevention to great administration in progressive local government. Many attempts have been developed by government to curb the scourge of this problem by establishment of a number of public sector organizations hinged upon precepts of the constitution, such as Chapter 9 institutions. Regardless of so many watch-dog organizations in South Africa, it is obvious that these instruments are lacking to forestall and control debasement, because of helpless administration rehearses, for example, shortcoming and "holes" in practice. Moreover, the government and public sector continually see exposition of lack of ethical leadership, ethical administration and ethical public service as a result. Apparent refusal to follow the statutory prescripts in the form of PFMA and MFMA demonstrate a plethora of unending meanders to total decay and maleficence. According to Naidoo (2010) Administration and service delivery failures by local government can generally be ascribed to : (1) Poor leadership (2) Unrealistic planning (3) Lack of proper community engagement (4) Trust deficit (5) Incompetent staff and management It is interesting that issues raised over a decade ago, which were already proving a predominant challenge to service delivery, are still a problem 10 years later and over 25 years of democratic rule in South Africa. In 2010, Naidoo's study collected data from households, which indicated that appointment of officials to office was inappropriate and irregular. This was further compounded by low skills levels and non-responsive employee capacity development suitable to the paradigm of local government. It is in this way contended there is progressively a requirement for moral authority and ethical leadership culture in the public service and local government. This article hence recommends the requirement for a framework that will put local government leadership and staff on a trajectory with sequential development indicators providing verification at each stage. The C.O.S.T.A. Framework is hereby proposed.
Suggested Citation
Costa, King & Siganga, Selina, 2020.
"Implementing The C.O.S.T.A Municipal Change Model (M-C-M),"
AfricArxiv
7az4u_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:africa:7az4u_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7az4u_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:africa:7az4u_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/africarxiv/discover .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.