IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/grafun/001777.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of NICE Technology Appraisal Decisions ‘Recommended in Line with Clinical Practice’

Author

Listed:
  • Aurea Duran;Nancy Devlin;Phill O’Neill;Amanda Cole

Abstract

Between January 2007 and June 2016 nearly a quarter (89 of 407) of all National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)-reported decisions for individual technologies assessed through their technology appraisal (TA) process have been characterised by them as recommended in line with clinical practice (RiLCP), to be distinguished from recommended in line with marketing authorisation. These RiLCP decisions are counted as ‘recommended’ in NICE statistics summarising technology appraisal (TA) decision outcomes, and 44% percent (89 of 203) of all ‘recommended’ decisions in the period 2007-2016 are given this classification. The objectives of this study are twofold: First, we qualitatively assess documentation associated with RiLCP decisions to create a framework to describe common themes and criteria used to reach those decisions. Second, we assess the level of patient access associated with each RiLCP decision using a previously developed method – the ‘M’ score.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurea Duran;Nancy Devlin;Phill O’Neill;Amanda Cole, 2016. "An Analysis of NICE Technology Appraisal Decisions ‘Recommended in Line with Clinical Practice’," Grant-Funded Research 001777, Office of Health Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ohe:grafun:001777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/analysis-nice-technology-appraisal-decisions-recommended-line-clinical-practice/attachment-ilcp-nice-report-research-report-final-v2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    An Analysis of NICE Technology Appraisal Decisions ‘Recommended in Line with Clinical Practice’;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:grafun:001777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.