IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaac/45-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What role for social sciences in innovation?: Re-assessing how scientific disciplines contribute to different industries

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Paunov

    (OECD)

  • Sandra Planes-Satorra

    (OECD)

  • Tadanori Moriguchi

    (Japan Patent Office)

Abstract

Knowledge transfer between industry and science is fundamental to innovation. There are important differences across scientific disciplines and sectors of activity in that, for instance, the financial and pharmaceutical sectors have different demands for science inputs. This paper reviews the data sources and associated methodologies available to measure different types of science-industry interaction. It applies these insights to re-assess the contributions of social sciences to industry and the disciplinary needs of the ICT sector. The paper finds that commonly used methodologies fail to shed light on a number of important industry-science interaction channels, and introduce biases in assessing connections. Using new evidence from labour force and university graduate surveys can help to some extent. The paper shows how these additional data allow to better capture the contributions of social scientists and the complexity of disciplinary demands of the digital economy. However, new data sources and methods should be further explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Paunov & Sandra Planes-Satorra & Tadanori Moriguchi, 2017. "What role for social sciences in innovation?: Re-assessing how scientific disciplines contribute to different industries," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 45, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:45-en
    DOI: 10.1787/8a306011-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/8a306011-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/8a306011-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stilyana V. Mikova & Lilyana K. Mihova & Miroslav G. Stefanov, 2020. "Interaction Between Higher Education Institutions And Business Organisations In The Field Of Logistics And Supply Chain Management," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 116-129.
    2. Diekhoff, Josefine & Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Rammer, Christian, 2019. "Stand der Messung von Interaktionen zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft im internationalen Vergleich," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 248650.
    3. Diekhof, Josefine & Eckl, Verena & Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Nguyen, Thu-Van & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Stenke, Gero, 2019. "Knowledge flows between science and industry and how to measure them," ZEW policy briefs 9/2019, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    academic disciplines; industry sectors; information and communication technologies (ICT); innovation; knowledge transfer; review of data sources and associated methodologies; Science-industry linkages; social sciences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:45-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.