IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaac/16-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of Industrial Policy: Methodological Issues and Policy Lessons

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Warwick

    (Warwick Economics)

  • Alistair Nolan

    (OECD)

Abstract

Industrial policy, broadly defined, covers a multitude of policy instruments and approaches. While there has been a recent revival of interest in industrial policy around the world, systematic evidence of efficacy is relatively scarce. This report brings together the work of an OECD expert group that has considered recent evidence from the evaluation of industrial policy. The report focuses on three specific policy areas, namely: support for R&D; capital market interventions (with a focus on risk capital); and public procurement for innovation. The report also examines three areas where packages of industrial policy measures are generally applied: sector approaches including public-private partnerships; policies towards clusters and business networks; and national industrial strategies. In many areas of industrial policy, evaluation faces particular methodological challenges. These challenges are outlined in the report, which concludes by drawing together the main policy lessons from the available evaluation evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Warwick & Alistair Nolan, 2014. "Evaluation of Industrial Policy: Methodological Issues and Policy Lessons," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 16, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:16-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jz181jh0j5k-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz181jh0j5k-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jz181jh0j5k-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Zhaohui & Tan, Yafei, 2022. "Can green industrial policy promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 59-75.
    2. Jan Fagerberg & Gernot Hutschenreiter, 2020. "Coping with Societal Challenges: Lessons for Innovation Policy Governance," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 279-305, June.
    3. Bofinger, Peter & Geißendörfer, Lisa & Haas, Thomas & Mayer, Fabian, 2023. "Credit as an instrument for growth: A monetary explanation of the Chinese growth story," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 107, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    4. Bessonova, Evguenia, 2023. "Firms’ efficiency, exits and government procurement contracts," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Jingxiao Zhang & Haiyan Xie & Hui Li, 2017. "Positioning and Priorities of Growth Management in Construction Industrialization: Chinese Firm-Level Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Natalia Evgenyevna Antonova, 2018. "Evaluation of Economic Agents Responses of on Institutional Changes in the Region Forest Complex," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 4, pages 115-138.
    7. Jacek Lewkowicz & Anna Lewczuk, 2022. "Innovation through Collaboration," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 36-56, January.
    8. Constantino Hevia & Norman V. Loayza & Claudia Meza-Cuadra, 2023. "Industrial Policies vs Public Goods under Asymmetric Information," Revista Economía, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, vol. 46(91), pages 39-52.
    9. Michael Böheim, 2016. "Umweltpolitik als Kernelement einer systemischen Industriepolitik zur Förderung eines nachhaltigen Wirtschaftswachstums," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(1), pages 39-46, January.
    10. Cameli, Simone Amato, 2023. "A complexity economics framework for 21st-century industrial policy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 168-178.
    11. repec:wsr:pbrief:y:2014:i:023 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ron Crawford, 2021. "Focused innovation policy: Lessons from international experience," Working Papers 2021/03, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    13. Inga Ivanova & Nataliya Smorodinskaya & Loet Leydesdorff, 2020. "On measuring complexity in a post-industrial economy: the ecosystem’s approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 197-212, February.
    14. Laatsit, Mart & Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Åsa & Nilsson, Magnus, 2023. "Capturing the system-level effects of innovation policy: an assessment of publicly funded innovative entrepreneurship in Sweden," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    15. Lucchese, Matteo & Nascia, Leopoldo & Pianta, Mario, 2017. "Politica industriale e tecnologia in Italia [Industrial policy and technology in Italy]," MPRA Paper 77182, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Silva Filipe & Carreira Carlos, 2017. "Financial Constraints: Do They Matter to Allocate R&D Subsidies?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Wade, Robert, 2020. "Science and technology policies and the middle-income trap: lessons from Vietnam," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100712, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Russell, Martha G. & Smorodinskaya, Nataliya V., 2018. "Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 114-131.
    19. Wang, Yufei & Liao, Zhongju, 2023. "Functional industrial policy mechanism under natural resource conflict: A case study on the Chinese new energy vehicle industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Janssen, Matthijs J., 2019. "What bangs for your buck? Assessing the design and impact of Dutch transformative policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 78-94.
    21. Matthijs Janssen, 2016. "What bangs for your bucks? Assessing the design and impact of transformative policy," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 16-05, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Dec 2016.
    22. Claire Dujardin & Virginie Louis & Florian Mayneris, 2015. "Les pôles de compétitivité wallons Quel impact sur les performances économiques des entreprises ? The Walloon competitiveness clusters and their impact on firms’ economic performances?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2015017, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    23. Andrey Georgievich Fonotov & Olga Efimovna Bergal’, 2020. "Territorial Clusters in the System of Spacial Development: Foreign Experience," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 4, pages 113-135.
    24. Karl Aiginger, 2014. "Industrial Policy for a Sustainable Growth Path," WIFO Working Papers 469, WIFO.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaac:16-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.