IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stdaaa/2013-5-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Home Sweet Home: The Determinants of Residential Satisfaction and its Relation with Well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Carlotta Balestra

    (OECD)

  • Joyce Sultan

    (OECD)

Abstract

Housing is a core element of people’s material living standards. It is essential to meet basic needs, such as for shelter from weather conditions, and to offer a sense of personal security, privacy and personal space. Good housing conditions are also essential for people’s health and affect childhood development. Further, housing costs make up a large share of the household budget and constitute the main component of household wealth. Residential satisfaction is a broad concept, and is associated with multidimensional aspects including physical, social, and neighbourhood factors, as well as psychological and sociodemographic characteristics of the residents. By taking advantage of two household surveys (the EU-SILC ad hoc module on housing for European countries; and the Gallup World Poll for OECD countries and other major economies), this paper uses ordered probit analysis to explore the link between households’ residential satisfaction and a number of variables related to individuals, the households to which they belong, and the characteristics of the dwelling and neighbourhood where they live. The major findings of this analysis show a complex relationship between residential satisfaction and housing characteristics including neighbourhood’s features. Individual and household socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. age, gender, education) play a secondary role once dwelling and neighbourhood features are controlled for. Understanding the factors that lead to satisfaction with housing and residential environment is key for planning successful and effective housing policies. Le logement est un aspect essentiel des conditions de vie matérielles. Il doit à la fois répondre aux besoins fondamentaux, en offrant notamment un abri contre les intempéries, et donner aux individus un sentiment de sécurité et un espace d’intimité. Les conditions de logement jouent également un rôle capital dans la santé des individus et le développement des enfants. Par ailleurs, le coût du logement représente une part importante du budget des ménages et constitue leur principal patrimoine. La notion de satisfaction vis-à-vis du logement est un concept large, multidimensionnel, et incluant des facteurs physiques et sociaux ainsi que certaines caractéristiques psychologiques et sociodémographiques des résidents. Combinant deux enquêtes différentes sur les conditions de vie des ménages (le module EU-SILC sur le logement et l’enquête Gallup World Poll sur les pays de l’OCDE ainsi que sur les économies majeures), ce papier fait usage d’une analyse en probit ordonné afin d’explorer le lien entre la satisfaction des ménages vis-à-vis de leur logement et un ensemble de facteurs ayant attrait à la situation personnelle des individus ainsi que les caractéristiques de leur logement et de la zone de résidence. Cet article caractérise une relation complexe entre la satisfaction vis-à-vis du logement et ces caractéristiques ainsi que certains aspects du voisinage. Les caractéristiques sociodémographique du ménage (comme l’âge, le genre, le niveau d’éducation…) n’ont finalement qu’un rôle mineur dans l’explication de la satisfaction pour le logement. Une bonne compréhension des facteurs visant à un accroissement de la satisfaction vis-à-vis du logement est essentielle pour l’élaboration de politiques effectives sur le logement.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlotta Balestra & Joyce Sultan, 2013. "Home Sweet Home: The Determinants of Residential Satisfaction and its Relation with Well-being," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2013/5, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2013/5-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jzbcx0czc0x-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jzbcx0czc0x-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jzbcx0czc0x-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rubén Arrondo & Ana Cárcaba & Eduardo González, 2021. "Drivers of Subjective Well-being in Spain: Are There Gender Differences?," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(5), pages 2131-2154, October.
    2. Cinzia Di Novi & Anna Marenzi & Dino Rizzi, 2018. "Do healthcare tax credits help poor-health individuals on low incomes?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(2), pages 293-307, March.
    3. Adolfo Morrone & Alfonso Piscitelli & Antonio D’Ambrosio, 2019. "How Disadvantages Shape Life Satisfaction: An Alternative Methodological Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 477-502, January.
    4. Jakub Adamec & Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák, 2021. "How to Measure Sustainable Housing: A Proposal for an Indicator-Based Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Matel Anna, 2020. "Tenure Status, Housing Conditions and Residential Satisfaction of Adolescents," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 24-32, December.
    6. Richard Henry Rijnks & Sierdjan Koster & Philip McCann, 2018. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Amenity and Labor Market Migration," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 183-209, March.
    7. Iftekhar, Md Sayed & Polyakov, Maksym & Rogers, Abbie, 2022. "Social preferences for water sensitive housing features in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Meimei Wang & Yongchun Yang & Bo Zhang & Mengqin Liu & Qing Liu, 2019. "How Does Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy Influence Residents’ Perceptions of Rural Living Conditions? A Study of 16 Villages in Gansu Province, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Borgoni, Riccardo & Michelangeli, Alessandra & Pirola, Federica, 2018. "Residential Satisfaction for a Continuum of Households: Evidence from European Countries," GLO Discussion Paper Series 190, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Minjung Cho, 2020. "Housing Workers’ Evaluations of Residential Environmental Quality in South Korean Welfare Housing for Low-Income, Single-Parent Families," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Tuan Anh Nguyen & Tuyen Quang Tran & Huong Van Vu & Dat Quoc Luu, 2017. "Housing satisfaction and its determinants among residents living in affordable apartments in urban Hanoi, Vietnam," Working Papers 03, Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam.
    12. Bo Kyong Seo & In Hyee Hwang & Yi Sun & Juan Chen, 2022. "Homeownership, Depression, and Life Satisfaction in China: The Gender and Urban-Rural Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Elena Pirani & Maria Veronica Dorgali & Valentina Tocchioni & Alessandra Petrucci, 2024. "Housing Conditions, Neighbourhood Area and Life Satisfaction in Old Age," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2024_06, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bien-être; enquête; household; housing satisfaction; ménages; neighbourhood; satisfaction à l’égard du logement; surveys; well-being; zone de résidence;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2013/5-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.