IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaab/2018-02-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Safety of E-Bikes in The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Schepers

    (Utrecht University)

  • Karin Klein Wolt

    (Consumer and Safety Institute)

  • Elliot Fishman

    (Institute for Sensible Transport)

Abstract

This case-control study compares the likelihood and injury severity of crashes between users of e-bikes and classic bikes in The Netherlands. Use of e-bikes with a maximum speed of 25 km/h is rapidly increasing in European countries. Cyclists being hospitalised are compared to those being sent home after the treatment at the emergency department in order to compare the injury consequences between e-bike and classic bike victims.Whilst results suggest that e-bike and classic bike users are equally likely to be involved in a crash and the severity of crashes are also about equal, the overall impact of e-bikes on road safety is complex and requires more research. As with all forms of physical activity, injuries need to be weighed against the health benefits of more cycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Schepers & Karin Klein Wolt & Elliot Fishman, 2018. "The Safety of E-Bikes in The Netherlands," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2018/02, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2018/02-en
    DOI: 10.1787/21de1ffa-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/21de1ffa-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/21de1ffa-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2023. "E-Bike Charging Infrastructure in the Workplace—Should Employers Provide It?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2018/02-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.