IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaab/2017-21-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modern Tram and Public Transport Integration in Chinese Cities: A case study of Suzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Lin Chen

    (Xi’an Jiaotong - Liverpool University)

Abstract

This paper explores the role of modern trams in Chinese cities and identifies issues and challenges of integrating modern trams with other public transport modes. The Suzhou National High-tech District (SND) Tram is chosen as a representative case for study. The findings show that, due to the strict national policy and approval procedures, trams are often planned and constructed as a good alternative to metro systems. Instead of practically addressing transport congestion, with a “development-driven” and “control and management” ideology, the current approach emphasises new development and avoids potential confrontation and social unrest in dense urban areas. As a result, despite massive investment in tram and other public transport modes, public transport mobility is not competititve against car mobility. Lessons learnt from the Suzhou tram case include prioritising public transport, well articulating public transport systems at multiple levels, combining strategic planning and supportive policies, enabling open competition for tram operation, and exercising leadership for collective goverance.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Lin Chen, 2017. "Modern Tram and Public Transport Integration in Chinese Cities: A case study of Suzhou," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2017/21, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2017/21-en
    DOI: 10.1787/2f9438bb-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/2f9438bb-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/2f9438bb-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Basnak, Paul & Giesen, Ricardo & Muñoz, Juan Carlos, 2020. "Technology choices in public transport planning: A classification framework," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Chen, Chia-Lin, 2018. "Tram development and urban transport integration in Chinese cities: A case study of Suzhou," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 16-31.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2017/21-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.