IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaab/2015-7-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Report on Public Transport Provision in Rural and Depopulated Areas in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Peter White

    (University of Westminster)

Abstract

In drawing lessons from experience in the United Kingdom, it is useful to firstly examine some of the overall differences between the UK and Finland, both in respect of aggregate statistics and structure of the public transport system. The following statistics indicate the main comparisons. In many respects the main indicators are very similar (GDP in PPP terms, overall modal split, car ownership levels), with the very striking difference in population density, that for Finland being less than one tenth of the UK figure. In these circumstances it is not surprising that car ownership per head is somewhat higher (by 18.2%), and likewise total distance travelled per person (by 17.6%). An implication of these contrasts is that even areas regarded as ‘low density’ within the UK might not be classified as ‘low density’ by Finnish standards, and this may affect transferability of results.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter White, 2015. "Report on Public Transport Provision in Rural and Depopulated Areas in the United Kingdom," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2015/7, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2015/7-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jrvzrrqb49v-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrvzrrqb49v-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jrvzrrqb49v-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sörensen, Leif & Bossert, Andreas & Jokinen, Jani-Pekka & Schlüter, Jan, 2021. "How much flexibility does rural public transport need? – Implications from a fully flexible DRT system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 5-20.
    2. Bruzzone, Francesco & Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2021. "The integration of passenger and freight transport for first-last mile operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-48.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2015/7-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.