IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaab/2014-2-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuing Convenience in Public Transport: Roundtable Summary and Conclusions

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Wardman

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

The experience of transport systems users, in terms of comfort, reliability, safety and above all convenience, is critical in determining demand for transport services, at least when there is a choice of alternative ways to travel. Convenience is one of the strongest attractions of the private car for passenger transport. For users of public transport, convenience is also clearly important but not always clearly defined and not often measured in designing transport systems or monitoring their operating performance. In many situations, an increase in public transport convenience reduces the unit costs of travel (euros/dollars per hour or cents per minute) and so provides benefits equivalent to an increase in travel speed. This report focuses on convenience and its importance to the user experience. It reviews operational definitions of convenience, evidence for the willingness of users to pay for convenience and the use of indicators to assess and improve the convenience of public transport, with a view to making it more effective and more competitive.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Wardman, 2014. "Valuing Convenience in Public Transport: Roundtable Summary and Conclusions," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2014/2, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2014/2-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jz40rk8h2f0-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz40rk8h2f0-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jz40rk8h2f0-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bansal, Prateek & Kessels, Roselinde & Krueger, Rico & Graham, Daniel J., 2022. "Preferences for using the London Underground during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 45-60.
    2. Wardman, Mark & Chintakayala, V. Phani K. & de Jong, Gerard, 2016. "Values of travel time in Europe: Review and meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 93-111.
    3. Fan, Yingling & Guthrie, Andrew & Levinson, David, 2016. "Waiting time perceptions at transit stops and stations: Effects of basic amenities, gender, and security," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 251-264.
    4. Haywood, Luke & Koning, Martin & Monchambert, Guillaume, 2017. "Crowding in public transport: Who cares and why?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 215-227.
    5. Ulak, Mehmet Baran & Yazici, Anil & Aljarrah, Mohammad, 2020. "Value of convenience for taxi trips in New York City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 85-100.
    6. Bansal, Prateek & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Tirachini, Alejandro & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2019. "Flexible estimates of heterogeneity in crowding valuation in the New York City subway," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 124-140.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2014/2-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.