IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaac/72-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organisational structure of budget management: Directions for reform in the Western Balkans and the Republic of Moldova

Author

Listed:
  • Ferdinand Pot
  • Janez Šušteršič

Abstract

This paper studies the differences between the organisation of budget management in selected government administrations in the Western Balkans and the Republic of Moldova and good practice across the European Union (EU). It observes that the ministry of finance (MoF) in these administrations typically engages in direct budget negotiations with a large number of budget organisations. This practice is in stark contrast with the budgeting approach observed in the EU, where the MoF only deals directly with government ministries and a limited number of constitutional bodies. The paper highlights the adverse consequences for the strategic role of the MoF for fiscal policy, the accountability of line ministries for budgeting and service delivery in their sector and the introduction of modern public financial management instruments such as medium-term budgeting and performance-based budgeting. This paper recommends that governments reduce the number of first-level budget organisations and give line ministries more responsibility for budget management in their sector. At the same time, the paper recommends strengthening line ministries’ accountability for budget management towards the parliament.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferdinand Pot & Janez Šušteršič, 2024. "Organisational structure of budget management: Directions for reform in the Western Balkans and the Republic of Moldova," SIGMA Papers 72, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaac:72-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5fd31556-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5fd31556-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5fd31556-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative budget classification; budget management; budget reform; first-level budget organisations; government and budgeting; medium-term budgeting; ministerial accountability; ministry of finance; performance-based budgeting;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaac:72-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.