IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/envaab/2019-02-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reporting Tables - potential areas of work under SBSTA and options - Part II: Financial support provided, mobilised and received

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Falduto

    (OECD)

  • Jane Ellis

    (OECD)

Abstract

The Modalities, Procedures and Guidelines (MPGs) adopted at COP24 in Katowice lay out rules for reporting and reviewing information under the Enhanced Transparency Framework of the Paris Agreement. The Katowice decision on the MPGs requests the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) to develop Common Tabular Formats (CTFs) for the reporting of information on, inter alia, financial support provided, mobilised and received. This paper analyses key issues and options that Parties may wish to consider when developing CTFs for reporting on these elements. The widespread use of CTFs for climate finance reporting could potentially facilitate comparability and aggregation of data and information on financial support in the future. This paper also develops options for CTF tables for the three areas of financial support analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Falduto & Jane Ellis, 2019. "Reporting Tables - potential areas of work under SBSTA and options - Part II: Financial support provided, mobilised and received," OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers 2019/02, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:envaab:2019/02-en
    DOI: 10.1787/b0ba5a7e-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/b0ba5a7e-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/b0ba5a7e-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulrike Will, 2020. "The Specification of Rules of Differentiation in the NDCs to the Paris Agreement," Discussion Paper Series RECAP15 31, RECAP15, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:envaab:2019/02-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.