IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/envaaa/256-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving evidence-based assessments of environmental policies

Author

Listed:
  • Olof Bystrom
  • Damien Dussaux
  • Katherine Hassett

Abstract

Studies that estimate the costs, benefits and environmental impacts of new policies provide essential decision support for policymakers. Although performing such assessments is standard practice for many ministries and regulatory agencies, their quality and supporting evidence often vary. Similarly, the evaluation of existing policies that are already in effect is essential for ensuring that they remain cost-effective and fit for purpose, and that opportunities for incremental improvements and learning are captured. This paper examines current practices across nine countries and the European Commission and provides insights on best practice for environmental policy assessment. The paper also reviews five case studies that showcase current practices. While the reviewed cases represent best practice or close to best practice, they also reveal opportunities for improvements. Several recommendations are provided based on the survey results and case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Olof Bystrom & Damien Dussaux & Katherine Hassett, 2025. "Improving evidence-based assessments of environmental policies," OECD Environment Working Papers 256, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:envaaa:256-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    best practice; cost-benefit analysis; Environmental policy evaluation; impact assessment; transparency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • Q00 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - General
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:envaaa:256-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.