IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaad/66-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of Fiscal Policies in Health Promotion

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Sassi

    (OECD)

  • Annalisa Belloni

    (OECD)

  • Chiara Capobianco

    (OECD)

Abstract

Taxes and other fiscal measures on health-related commodities are in widespread use. Alcoholic beverages and tobacco products have been subjected to taxation for a long time in most countries. Several OECD governments have passed legislation to increase existing taxes or to introduce new taxes on foods high in salt, sugar or fat in the past few years. Traditionally, commodity taxes have been primarily seen as a source of fiscal revenues and a way to address consumption externalities. More recently, an increased emphasis has been placed on the potential health benefits of commodity taxation, as evidence emerged of the adverse public health, social and economic consequences of the consumption of a range of commodities. This paper provides a review of the theoretical arguments and empirical evidence on the key factors that governments must address when considering the adoption of fiscal measures for health promotion, highlighting the strengths, as well as the limitations and pitfalls, of specific measures. The main focus of this paper is on taxes on health-related commodities, although a range of other fiscal measures may potentially be used in health promotion. Existing evidence of effects on consumption and health outcomes points to the conclusion that taxes on healthrelated commodities can be a powerful tool for health promotion, although the variety and complexity of the effects they generate require careful consideration by policy makers who intend to adopt new taxes or reform existing ones. The arguments in support of taxes being used to attain public health objectives are strong for tobacco products and alcoholic beverages, but less clear-cut for foods, in which case the value of using taxes is highly dependent on their design and on the context in which they would be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Sassi & Annalisa Belloni & Chiara Capobianco, 2013. "The Role of Fiscal Policies in Health Promotion," OECD Health Working Papers 66, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaad:66-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k3twr94kvzx-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3twr94kvzx-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k3twr94kvzx-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hagenaars, Luc Louis & Jeurissen, Patrick Paulus Theodoor & Klazinga, Niek Sieds, 2017. "The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 887-894.
    2. Rosella Levaggi & Carmen Marchiori & Paolo M. Panteghini, 2022. "Lifestyle taxes in the presence of profit shifting," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 81-96, September.
    3. Breda, Joao & Castro, Lea Samanta Nash & Whiting, Stephen & Williams, Julianne & Jewell, Jo & Engesveen, Kaia & Wickramasinghe, Kremlin, 2020. "Towards better nutrition in Europe: Evaluating progress and defining future directions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Mounsey, Sarah & Veerman, Lennert & Jan, Stephen & Thow, Anne Marie, 2020. "The macroeconomic impacts of diet-related fiscal policy for NCD prevention: A systematic review," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaad:66-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.