IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaad/166-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PaRIS Field Trial Report: Technical report on the international PaRIS survey of people living with chronic conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Michael van den Berg

    (OECD)

  • Candan Kendir

    (OECD)

  • Diana Castelblanco

    (OECD)

  • Nicolas Larrain

    (OECD)

  • Frederico Guanais

    (OECD)

  • Oliver Groene
  • Pilar Illarramendi
  • Jose Maria Valderas
  • Rachel Williams
  • Mieke Rijken

Abstract

As populations age and the number of people with chronic conditions increases, countries need to assess how their health systems perform with regard to the management of chronic conditions. OECD's Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) initiative aims to measure outcomes and experiences of healthcare as reported by patients with chronic conditions as part of the efforts to improve quality of care. The PaRIS survey, an international survey of people living with chronic conditions who are managed in primary care, is implemented in twenty countries. Following a rigorous design and development phase, the PaRIS survey was field-tested in participating countries. This paper reports on the implementation and the results of the Field Trial. The Field Trial provided important lessons which have been used to improve the survey tools and the implementation of the Main Survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael van den Berg & Candan Kendir & Diana Castelblanco & Nicolas Larrain & Frederico Guanais & Oliver Groene & Pilar Illarramendi & Jose Maria Valderas & Rachel Williams & Mieke Rijken, 2024. "PaRIS Field Trial Report: Technical report on the international PaRIS survey of people living with chronic conditions," OECD Health Working Papers 166, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaad:166-en
    DOI: 10.1787/e5725c75-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/e5725c75-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/e5725c75-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaad:166-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.