IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaab/311-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gendered perceptions of social protection across OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • Valérie Frey
  • Lyydia Alajääskö
  • Jasmin Thomas

Abstract

Reflecting their weaker labour force attachment and lower earnings, women consistently report feeling greater economic insecurity than men across countries in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Results from the cross-national OECD Risks that Matter Survey illustrate that similar gender gaps emerge in perceptions of social protection systems: women are far less confident than men in their ability to access adequate benefits and services when they need them, both in working age and old age. This perceived inaccessibility likely reflects gender gaps in “hassle costs” associated with social programme applications and intra-household allocations of administrative burden, but it also likely reflects women’s lower social security contributions. This paper illustrates gender gaps in the design of social programmes and suggests ways by which governments can better mainstream gender when improving the accessibility and adequacy of social protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Valérie Frey & Lyydia Alajääskö & Jasmin Thomas, 2024. "Gendered perceptions of social protection across OECD countries," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 311, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:311-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:311-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.