IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaab/222-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?: Findings from the European Social Survey 2002/03 – 2016/17

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Heath

    (Centre for Social Investigation, Nuffield College, Oxford)

  • Lindsay Richards

    (Centre for Social Investigation, Nuffield College, Oxford)

Abstract

Nordic countries such as Sweden, Norway and Finland have been consistently the most favourable to immigration while eastern European countries such as the Czech Republic and Hungary have been the least favourable. Despite their relatively high average levels of support for immigration, however, many countries of western and northern Europe are quite strongly polarized internally along educational and age lines. This can perhaps explain why political divisions over immigration can be so salient in these countries. Comparing results from 2002/03 and 2016/07, one finds that European attitudes were on average quite stable. However, a number of countries became more generous while several others became more negative. On the issue of government policy towards refugees, there was a marked shift in a negative direction after the 2015/16 refugee crisis. Countries such as Austria, Germany, and Sweden which had experienced large inflows of refugees showed particularly large declines in public support for generous government policy towards asylum requests.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Heath & Lindsay Richards, 2019. "How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?: Findings from the European Social Survey 2002/03 – 2016/17," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 222, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:222-en
    DOI: 10.1787/0adf9e55-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/0adf9e55-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/0adf9e55-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazmus Sakib & Sara Farzana Ananna, 2022. "Perception of Refugee Integration and Entitlements Among a Co-ethnic Population: Othering the Rohingyas in Bangladesh," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1667-1684, December.
    2. Carol, Sarah & Kuipers, Coco & Koesling, Philipp & Kaspers, Milan, 2021. "Ethnic and Religious Discrimination in the Wedding Venue Business: Evidence from Two Field Experiments in Germany and Austria," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Advance A, pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Social Survey; Immigration; Public opinion; Refugees; Symbolic boundaries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F22 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Migration
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J61 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:222-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.