IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaaf/49-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender imbalances in the teaching profession

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Historically across the OECD, the teaching profession has been largely dominated by women. The share of female teachers has been increasing over the past decade – reaching 68% in 2014 for all levels of education combined. The gender disparity decreases gradually with the level of education, from 97% of women in pre-primary education to 43% in tertiary education. Between 2005 and 2014, the gender gap increased at the primary and secondary levels, but decreased at the tertiary level.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2017. "Gender imbalances in the teaching profession," Education Indicators in Focus 49, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:49-en
    DOI: 10.1787/54f0ef95-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/54f0ef95-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/54f0ef95-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Njoh, Ambe J. & Bigon, Liora & Ananga, Erick O. & Ayuk-Etang, Richard A., 2018. "Institutional, economic and socio-cultural factors accounting for gender-based inequalities in land title procurement in Cameroon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 116-125.
    2. Francesca Barigozzi & Cesare Di Timoteo & Chiara Monfardini, 2020. "Italian Families in the 21st Century: Gender Gaps in Time Use and their Evolution," CHILD Working Papers Series 84 JEL Classification: J1, Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA.
    3. Connie Bayudan-Dacuycuy, 2018. "Crafting Policies and programs for Women in the Agriculture Sector," Working Papers id:12904, eSocialSciences.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:49-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.