IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/325-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Collective Intelligence Model for Education (CIME)

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoya Okubo

Abstract

This study introduces the Collective Intelligence Model for Evaluation (CIME), a framework designed to address the limitations inherent in traditional assessment methods. CIME integrates psychometric modelling, large language models (LLMs), and human expertise to effectively assess complex and granular competencies, including both cognitive operations and non-cognitive skills, across diverse assessment contexts. By leveraging AI-driven analysis through a continually updated knowledge database, complemented by expert oversight, CIME enhances the precision and reliability of assessments. The model establishes rigorous and continuously updated scoring criteria to ensure internal consistency, eliminate bias, and maintain international comparability. In addition, CIME incorporates advanced diagnostic methodologies, utilising psychometric scaling and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to provide comprehensive diagnostics. This ensures that all outputs are anchored in accurate and verified sources. The study also highlights CIME’s ability to deliver personalised feedback, tailoring diagnostics to individual learners’ competencies and backgrounds. This enables personalised learning pathways and supports informed decision-making in education. Furthermore, CIME offers a scalable and efficient solution for modern educational assessment and policymaking by continuously refining its knowledge base and securely integrating with external data sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoya Okubo, 2025. "Collective Intelligence Model for Education (CIME)," OECD Education Working Papers 325, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:325-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:325-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.