IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/259-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How are higher education systems in OECD countries resourced?: Evidence from an OECD Policy Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Golden
  • Lisa Troy
  • Thomas Weko

Abstract

The OECD Higher Education Policy Survey (HEPS) is a new instrument developed by the OECD Higher Education Policy Team to gather comparative information on system features and characteristics of policies across OECD jurisdictions, to support policy analysis and peer learning. The first HEPS was fielded in 2020, to support the ongoing thematic project on Resourcing Higher Education. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the results of the survey, examining student support systems, institutional funding mechanisms, human resource policies and higher education resource governance across the 29 OECD jurisdictions responding to the survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Golden & Lisa Troy & Thomas Weko, 2021. "How are higher education systems in OECD countries resourced?: Evidence from an OECD Policy Survey," OECD Education Working Papers 259, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:259-en
    DOI: 10.1787/0ac1fbad-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/0ac1fbad-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/0ac1fbad-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:259-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.