IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/696-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structural Policies to Overcome Geographic Barriers and Create Prosperity in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Yvan Guillemette

    (OECD)

Abstract

New Zealand’s living standards remain well below the OECD average. This is entirely attributable to persistently low labour productivity, which in turn is related to economic geography as well as structural policy factors. The small size and remoteness of the economy diminish its access to world markets, the scale and efficiency of domestic businesses, the level of competition and proximity to the world’s technology frontier. This points to the need for a “New Zealand policy advantage”, that is, a set of structural policies attractive and welcoming enough to overcome the geographic handicap and attract the drivers of prosperity – investment, skills and ideas – to New Zealand. The reforms of the 1980s and 1990s laid much of the groundwork for creating this advantage and for a pick-up in productivity growth. But in recent years, New Zealand has lost ground relative to its OECD peers. The reform focus shifted away from growth and the government introduced much often poor quality regulation. Policies should be refocused around the productivity goal in a number of areas, beginning with those covered in this paper, namely international trade, the business climate for domestic and foreign investment, public sector efficiency, infrastructure, innovation and natural resources management. This paper also evaluates the recently legislated emissions trading scheme through a productivity lens. This Working Paper relates to the 2009 OECD Economic Survey of New Zealand (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/nz). Les politiques structurelles requises pour surmonter les obstacles géographiques et promouvoir la prospérité en Nouvelle-Zélande Les niveaux de vie en Nouvelle-Zélande restent bien inférieurs à la moyenne de l’OCDE. Cet écart est entièrement attribuable à une croissance durablement faible de la productivité du travail, qui s’explique pour sa part par la géographie économique ainsi que par des facteurs liés à la politique structurelle. La petite taille et l’éloignement de l’économie limitent son accès aux marchés mondiaux ainsi que l’échelle et l’efficacité des entreprises intérieures, et influent sur le degré de concurrence et la situation par rapport à la frontière technologique mondiale. Il faut, dans ces conditions, élaborer des politiques qui représentent un avantage pour la Nouvelle-Zélande, c’est à dire un ensemble de politiques structurelles suffisamment attrayantes pour surmonter le handicap géographique et attirer dans le pays les moteurs de la prospérité – investissements, compétences et idées. Les réformes des années 80 et 90 ont largement préparé le terrain à la mise en oeuvre de telles politiques et à un redressement de la croissance de la productivité dans les années à venir. Ces dernières années, cependant, les autorités ont grignoté une partie des progrès réalisés durant la période de réformes, notamment en introduisant de nombreuses réglementations, souvent mal conçues. Les politiques devraient être recentrées autour de l’objectif de productivité dans plusieurs domaines, à commencer par ceux couverts dans la présente étude, à savoir le commerce international, les conditions de l’investissement national et étranger, l’efficacité du secteur public, l’infrastructure, l’innovation et la gestion des ressources naturelles. Le système d’échange de droits d’émissions, qui a récemment fait l’objet d’un texte de loi, est aussi examiné ici dans l’optique de la productivité. Ce Document de travail se rapporte à l’Étude économique de l’OCDE de la Nouvelle-Zélande 2009 (www.oecd.org/eco/etudes/nz).

Suggested Citation

  • Yvan Guillemette, 2009. "Structural Policies to Overcome Geographic Barriers and Create Prosperity in New Zealand," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 696, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:696-en
    DOI: 10.1787/224223031816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/224223031816
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/224223031816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Procter, Roger, 2011. "Echanching Productivity: Towards an Updated Action Agenda," Occasional Papers 11/1, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    copyright; croissance; eau; economic geography; emissions trading scheme; ETS; foreign investment; géographie; infrastructure; infrastructure; innovation; innovation; investissement; investissement direct étranger; investment; living standards; natural resources; niveau de vie; productivity; productivity growth; productivité; regulation; regulatory; ressources naturelles; réglementation; standard of living; système de droits d’émissions; taxation; taxation; water;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • O56 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Oceania

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:696-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.