IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/1614-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Building the evidence for OECD integrity and anti-corruption agenda: The current situation and avenues for future analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Smidova

Abstract

Potential economic benefits of integrity and anti-corruption policies seem large. Nevertheless, much of the existing empirical evidence lacks precise and actionable policy indicators that could guide policy makers on tangible improvements of successful reforms. To move the policy analysis further, both policy and outcome indicators are needed. In this context, the paper reviews OECD’s involvement in integrity and anti-corruption agenda as well as available indicators of integrity and anti-corruption policies and outcomes. It outlines avenues for future analysis that include assessment of public procurement procedures and policy drivers explaining experience with corruption and public spending efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Smidova, 2020. "Building the evidence for OECD integrity and anti-corruption agenda: The current situation and avenues for future analysis," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1614, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1614-en
    DOI: 10.1787/80ebe6e6-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/80ebe6e6-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/80ebe6e6-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samson Tiki & Belinda Luke & Janet Mack, 2021. "Perceptions of bribery in Papua New Guinea’s public sector: Agency and structural influences," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 217-227, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    anti-corruption; corruption; corruption outcome indicators; experience of corruption; integrity; OECD; perceived corruption; policy indicators; public procurement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1614-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.