IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/1179-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empirical Evidence on the Effects of Environmental Policy Stringency on Productivity Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Albrizio

    (OECD)

  • Tomasz Koźluk

    (OECD)

  • Vera Zipperer

    (OECD)

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of changes in the stringency of environmental policies on productivity growth in OECD countries. Using a new environmental policy stringency (EPS) index, it estimates a reduced-form model of multi-factor productivity growth, where the effect of countries' environmental policies varies with pollution intensity of the industry and technological advancement. A multi-layer analysis provides insights at the aggregate economy, the industry and the firm level. At the aggregate economy level, a negative effect on productivity growth is found one year ahead of the policy change. This negative “announcement effect” is offset within three years after the implementation. At the industry level, a tightening of environmental policy is associated with a short-term increase in industry-level productivity growth, for the most technologically advanced country-industry pairs. This effect diminishes with the distance to the global productivity frontier, becoming insignificant at larger distances. At the firm level, only the technologically most advanced firms show a positive effect on productivity growth from a tightening of environmental policies, while a third of firms, the less productive ones, experience a productivity slowdown. Données empiriques sur les effets de la sévérité des politiques environnementales sur la croissance de la productivité Ce document étudie l’impact qu’ont les modifications de la sévérité des politiques environnementales sur la croissance de la productivité dans les pays de l’OCDE. À l’aide d’un nouvel indice de sévérité des politiques environnementales (SPE), il estime un modèle en forme réduite de la croissance de la productivité multifactorielle, dans lequel l’effet des politiques environnementales des pays varie selon l’intensité de pollution de l’industrie et le degré d’avancement technologique. Une analyse multicouche donne des indications au niveau macro-économique, à celui de l’industrie et à celui des entreprises. Au niveau macro-économique, un effet négatif sur la croissance de la productivité est observé un an avant la modification des politiques. Cet « effet d’annonce » négatif est compensé dans un délai de trois ans après la mise en oeuvre. Au niveau de l’industrie, le durcissement des politiques environnementales est associé à une accélération à court terme de la croissance de la productivité pour les couples pays-industrie les plus avancés d’un point de vue technologique. Cet effet diminue jusqu’à devenir insignifiant à mesure qu’on s’éloigne de la frontière de productivité mondiale. Au niveau des entreprises, enfin, seules celles qui sont les plus en pointe du point de vue technologique voient la croissance de leur productivité influencée de façon positive par un durcissement des politiques environnementales, tandis qu’un tiers des entreprises, en l’occurrence les moins productives, accusent un ralentissement de leur productivité.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Albrizio & Tomasz Koźluk & Vera Zipperer, 2014. "Empirical Evidence on the Effects of Environmental Policy Stringency on Productivity Growth," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1179, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1179-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jxrjnb36b40-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjnb36b40-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jxrjnb36b40-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albrizio, Silvia & Kozluk, Tomasz & Zipperer, Vera, 2017. "Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 209-226.
    2. Feng, Guohua & McLaren, Keith R. & Yang, Ou & Zhang, Xiaohui & Zhao, Xueyan, 2021. "The impact of environmental policy stringency on industrial productivity growth: A semi-parametric study of OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Julia Bahlmann & Paul J.J. Welfens, 2021. "Environmental Policy Stringency and Foreign Direct Investment: New Insights from a Gravity Model Approach," EIIW Discussion paper disbei294, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    4. Miria A. Pigato, 2019. "Fiscal Policies for Development and Climate Action," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 31051.
    5. Oguzhan Akgun & Boris Cournède & Jean-Marc Fournier, 2017. "The effects of the tax mix on inequality and growth," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1447, OECD Publishing.
    6. De Santis R. & Jona Lasinio C., 2016. "Environmental Policies, Innovation and Productivity in the EU," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 615-635, December.
    7. Ozili, Peterson K, 2023. "Financial inclusion and environmental sustainability," MPRA Paper 116586, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. R. De Santis & P. Esposito & C. Jona Lasinio, 2021. "Environmental regulation and productivity growth: Main policy challenges," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 165, pages 264-277.
    9. Benatti, Nicola & Groiss, Martin & Kelly, Petra & Lopez-Garcia, Paloma, 2024. "The impact of environmental regulation on clean innovation: are there crowding out effects?," Working Paper Series 2946, European Central Bank.
    10. Müge Adalet McGowan & Dan Andrews & Valentine Millot, 2017. "Insolvency regimes, zombie firms and capital reallocation," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1399, OECD Publishing.
    11. Benatti, Nicola & Groiss, Martin & Kelly, Petra & Lopez-Garcia, Paloma, 2024. "Environmental regulation and productivity growth in the euro area: Testing the porter hypothesis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Don Drummond & Evan Capeluck & Matthew Calver, 2015. "The Key Challenge for Canadian Public Policy: Generating Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth," CSLS Research Reports 2015-11, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    13. Spyros Arvanitis & Michael Peneder & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2016. "Development and Utilization of Energy-related Technologies, Economic Performance and the Role of Policy Instruments," KOF Working papers 16-419, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    14. Abbas Valadkhani & Israfil Roshdi & Russell Smyth, 2015. "A multicomponent DEA approach to measure the economic and energy efficiencies of OECD countries," Monash Economics Working Papers 09-15, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    15. Robert Hagemann, 2018. "Tax Policies for Inclusive Growth: Prescription versus Practice," OECD Economic Policy Papers 24, OECD Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environmental policies; environmental policy stringency; environmental regulations; hypothèse de Porter; multifactor productivity; Porter hypothesis; productivité multifactorielle; réglementation environnementale; sévérité des politiques environnementales;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1179-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.