IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/devaae/34-fr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Traditions et développement : Parfois, « le mieux est l'ennemi du bien »

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Jütting

    (OCDE)

  • Denis Drechsler

    (OCDE)

  • Indra de Soysa

    (OCDE)

Abstract

Les institutions informelles – traditions, normes sociales, pratiques religieuses…– peuvent tantôt favoriser développement, tantôt lui faire obstacle. Tout effort pour faciliter le changement de ces institutions nécessite de prendre la pleine mesure des réalités locales et d’apprécier finement l’équilibre entre le cadre institutionnel formel et les institutions informelles en place. Faire la paix avec la tradition requière des choix politiques contre intuitives, et d’accepter que parfois « le mieux est l’ennemi du bien ».

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Jütting & Denis Drechsler & Indra de Soysa, 2006. "Traditions et développement : Parfois, « le mieux est l'ennemi du bien »," Centre de développement de l'OCDE - Repères 34, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:devaae:34-fr
    DOI: 10.1787/244566453842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/244566453842
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/244566453842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:devaae:34-fr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dcoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.