IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/rpcoen/pp_21-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

FROM ONE COP TO THE NEXT: How Has the Climate Finance Commitment Evolved During the Past Decades?

Author

Listed:
  • LARABI JAÏDI
  • RIM BERAHAB
  • SABRINE EMRAN

Abstract

This paper assesses the outcomes of COP29 in Baku, focusing on its achievements and shortcomings in advancing global climate governance. Key milestones included the adoption of the new collective quantified goal (NCQG), the tripling of climate finance commitments to $300 billion annually by 2035, and progress on Article 6 carbon markets to mobilize international cooperation and finance. However, finance remains insufficient to meet the needs of developing countries, and unresolved issues such as transparency and the risk of greenwashing challenge the integrity of carbon markets. The conference also failed to maintain momentum on fossil-fuel divestment, reflecting geopolitical divisions and waning ambition. As the world prepares for COP30 in Belém, Brazil, the credibility of the COP process depends on addressing these gaps and delivering stronger, actionable commitments to meet the Paris Agreement’s aim of keeping global warming within 1.5°C.

Suggested Citation

  • Larabi Jaïdi & Rim Berahab & Sabrine Emran, 2024. "FROM ONE COP TO THE NEXT: How Has the Climate Finance Commitment Evolved During the Past Decades?," Research papers & Policy papers on Commodities & Energy 2409, Policy Center for the New South.
    • Handle: RePEc:ocp:rpcoen:pp_21-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2024-12/PP_21-24%20%28Larabi%20Jai%CC%88di%2C%20Rim%20Berahab%2C%20Sabrine%20Emran%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpcoen:pp_21-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.