IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/rpaper/pp-08-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financializing Commodity Markets: Consequences, Advantages and African Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Otaviano Canuto
  • Sabrine Emran
  • Badr Mandri

Abstract

Africa has a wealth of natural resources, including minerals, agriculture, and energy commodities, which provides an opportunity for the financialization of these commodities on the continent, a concept that has gained global attention and sparked debate on the potential benefits and drawbacks. Although the financialization of commodities has been studied in various contexts, including in African countries, challenges such as liquidity constraints and market readiness have emerged as critical impediments to its widespread adoption. This paper examines the existing literature to clarify the positive and negative aspects of commodity financialization, drawing on global examples and specific cases within Africa. By examining best practices and lessons learned, this paper offers guidance on how African countries can navigate the complexities of preparing for and embracing commodity financialization in order to unlock its potential benefits while mitigating the associated risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Otaviano Canuto & Sabrine Emran & Badr Mandri, 2024. "Financializing Commodity Markets: Consequences, Advantages and African Case Study," Research papers & Policy papers 1983, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaper:pp-08-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2024-05/PP_08-24%20%28Otaviano%20%26%20Emran%20%26%20Mandri%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaper:pp-08-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.