IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nub/occpap/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Evolution of Cooperation Revisited

Author

Abstract

Robert Axelrod's seminal round-robin computer tournaments for the repeated prisoner's dilemma have been hailed as the explanation of the evolution of cooperation. In this paper, Axelrod's results are systematically re-examined in the light of new insights about computer simulations. In particular, this paper presents an overview of the effects of seven important simulation parameters on the results of round-robin simulations with two-state Moore machines. Furthermore, I provide a detailed analysis of how different strategic characteristics of the automata determine the effect changes in the parameter values have on their respective payoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Hoffmann, 1996. "The Evolution of Cooperation Revisited," Occasional Papers 1, Industrial Economics Division.
    • Handle: RePEc:nub:occpap:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/%7Elizrh2/chapter5.wpd
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Platkowski, Tadeusz & Siwak, Michal, 2008. "Mean-field approximation for two- and three-person Prisoner’s Dilemmas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(12), pages 2909-2918.
    2. Ding, Fei & Liu, Yun & Shen, Bo & Si, Xia-Meng, 2010. "An evolutionary game theory model of binary opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(8), pages 1745-1752.
    3. Robert Hoffmann, 2001. "The Ecology of Cooperation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 101-118, March.
    4. Dietz, Thomas, 2005. "The Darwinian trope in the drama of the commons: variations on some themes by the Ostroms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 205-225, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nub:occpap:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienotuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.