IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/niesrd/284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The incentive effects of means tested UK retirement benefits -- has the Pension Credit gone too far?

Author

Listed:
  • Dr Justin van de Ven

Abstract

Means testing plays and important role in state provided retirement benefits in the UK. Although it is well known that the behavioural incentives associated with means testing are theoretically ambiguous, little work has been conducted to infer the behavioural effects of contemporary means tested retirement benefits. This study uses a carefully calibrated structural model to explore labour supply, savings, and welfare effects for UK households of a revenue neutral shift from a state pension system based on a 40% withdrawal rate -- reflecting the current policy environment -- to a 70% withdrawal-rate -- which is mid-way between the current policy environment, and the 100% rate that was applied prior to October 2003. The analysis suggests that the policy counterfactual would have little effect on savings or retirement from a macro perspective, but would have some important distributional implications. Furthermore, the welfare analysis suggests that it would be preferable, from a lifetime perspective, to increase the withdrawal rate on means tested retirement benefits above the 40% rate that is currently applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr Justin van de Ven, 2006. "The incentive effects of means tested UK retirement benefits -- has the Pension Credit gone too far?," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 284, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Sefton & Justin Van De Ven & Martin Weale, 2008. "Means Testing Retirement Benefits: fostering equity or discouraging savings?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(528), pages 556-590, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.