IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/niesrd/197.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sterling Volatility and European Monetary Union

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Taylor

Abstract

The main idea behind this paper is that sterling has strong affinities with both the Deutsche mark (now euro) and dollar, reflecting their importance for UK external business, though they have been obscured by regime changes and temporary influences. In principle the D-mark should show comparable affinities, but in its case they have been eroded by the long process of monetary integration in Europe, which has led to its 'polarisation' against the dollar, and thence high volatility in the DM/$ exchange rate. Thanks to sterling's split affinities, the impact of D-mark/dollar volatility on the UK economy has been cushioned by a tendency for movements in DM/£ and $/£ rates to be mutually offsetting, with the result that sterling's overall or effective rate is appreciably less volatile than either of its key bilateral rates. By joining EMU, the UK would escape exchange-rate volatility on trade with the euro zone but would suffer a marked increase in volatility on trade with the rest of the world - assuming that the euro proves at least as unstable as the D-mark against the dollar, and that the dollar is a representative currency for trade with ROW. Accordingly the net effect of EMU participation on UK effective-rate volatility would depend crucially on the relative weights of the euro zone and ROW in UK trade and payments, and on the relative volatility of the DM-euro and sterling against third currencies. Evidence is presented to show that the UK is significantly less integrated with the EU via current payments than via merchandise trade, and that the pound's affinity with the dollar has increased since the UK left the ERM. Counterfactual estimates are then made of prospective UK exchange-rate volatility by re-weighting the official UK effective rate index to reflect alternative assumptions about sterling's future. If sterling's experience since leaving the ERM is a guide to its future outside EMU (if it has one), and if the euro emulates the D-mark's volatility since that time, counterfactual comparisons suggest that joining EMU would reduce UK effective exchange-rate volatility by around two thirds on a trade-weighted basis, but by only a third or less on a payments-weighted basis, which arguably captures sterling's split affinities better.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Taylor, 2002. "Sterling Volatility and European Monetary Union," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 197, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasanov Akram, 2011. "Exchange rate risk and trade flows: the case of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine," EERC Working Paper Series 11/09e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    2. Cheong, Chongcheul & Mehari, Tesfa & Williams, Leighton Vaughan, 2005. "The effects of exchange rate volatility on price competitiveness and trade volumes in the UK: A disaggregated approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 961-970, November.
    3. Comunale, Mariarosaria, 2014. "Euro-dollar polarization and heterogeneity in exchange rate pass-throughs within the euro zone," MPRA Paper 57704, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2014.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.