IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nip/nipewp/3-2025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From Words to Votes: Decoding Sentiment in Brazilian Presidential Candidates' Tweets

Author

Listed:
  • Joana Ferreira Cima

    (NIPE/Centre for Research in Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal)

  • Marco Catussi Paschoalotto

    (CICP/Research Center in Political Science, University of Minho, Portugal)

  • Hélder Costa

    (NIPE/Centre for Research in Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal)

  • Bruno Fernandes

    (NIPE/Centre for Research in Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal)

Abstract

This study investigates the sentiment analysis of tweets from the four most influential presidential candidates in the 2022 Brazilian elections. Tweets from July 1 to October 30 were gathered using a custom Python script, and the sentiments expressed in these tweets were analyzed with the VADER sentiment analysis library. Two econometric models were estimated to study temporal shifts in sentiment and the effect of opponents' sentiment. Results showed strategic shifts in sentiment during different campaign phases. Lula da Silva, the election winner, showed significant increases in negative tweets during the second-round campaign and seemed to adjust his sentiment based on opponents' sentiments, suggesting the potential effectiveness of adaptable communication strategies. This study contributes to understanding political communication dynamics on social media and their potential impact on electoral outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Joana Ferreira Cima & Marco Catussi Paschoalotto & Hélder Costa & Bruno Fernandes, 2025. "From Words to Votes: Decoding Sentiment in Brazilian Presidential Candidates' Tweets," NIPE Working Papers 3/2025, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
  • Handle: RePEc:nip:nipewp:3/2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/94831
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nip:nipewp:3/2025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NIPE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nipampt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.