IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/new/wpaper/2211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Informational Index of Income Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo L. dos Santos

    (Department of Economics, New School for Social Research)

Abstract

A new informational index of income inequality is proposed. Based on a combinatorial characterisation of entropy and on its generalisation by multivariate measures of co-information, the index addresses a limiting analytical choice embedded in Theil's two indices of income inequality. This yields a positive measure of inequality of opportunity in income-generating processes, defined in relation to probabilities that the population-wide distribution of income describes the set of possible income levels facing specified sub-groups of that population. Its measure across a population is given when sub-groups consist of each individual. This can be successively decomposed linearly by sub-groups defined by covariates of income. In those instances, the index also provides informational measures of phenomenological association and interaction between income and those covariates. On those bases the index improves on mean-log deviations as measures of "luck egalitarian" notions of equity; casts new light on and uncovers new properties in the Theil-Finezza index of segregation; offers a non-parametric generalisation of the Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition; and lays new conceptual foundations for work on the determinants and normative content of patterns of income differentiation in decentralised market economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo L. dos Santos, 2022. "The Informational Index of Income Inequality," Working Papers 2211, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2022/NSSR_WP_112022.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Amartya, 1997. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198292975.
    2. Amartya K. Sen, 1997. "From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 384-401, October.
    3. Fleurbaey, Marc, 1995. "Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 25-55, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martinet, Vincent & Del Campo, Stellio & Cairns, Robert D., 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue forthcomi.
    2. Meshach J. Aziakpono & Nicolette Cattaneo & T. D. Karoro, 2008. "Exchange rate pass-through to import prices in South Africa: Is there asymmetry?," Working Papers 086, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    3. Sam Harper & Eric Ruder & Henry A. Roman & Amelia Geggel & Onyemaechi Nweke & Devon Payne-Sturges & Jonathan I. Levy, 2013. "Using Inequality Measures to Incorporate Environmental Justice into Regulatory Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Somwrita Sarkar, 2024. "Normative urban science," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(5), pages 1079-1081, June.
    5. Freiberg, Germán & Giannotti, Mariana & Bittencourt, Taina A., 2024. "Are mass transit projects and public transport planning overlooking uneven distributional effects? Empirical evidence from Sao Paulo, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Garashchuk, Anna & Castillo, Fernando Isla & Rivera, Pablo Podadera, 2023. "Economic cohesion and development of the European Union's regions and member states - A methodological proposal to measure and identify the degree of regional economic cohesion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Bertil Tungodden, 2004. "Some Reflections on the Role of Moral Reasoning in Economics," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 30, pages 49-59.
    8. Alem, Douglas & Caunhye, Aakil M. & Moreno, Alfredo, 2022. "Revisiting Gini for equitable humanitarian logistics," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    9. Qu, Xiangyu, 2022. "On the measurement of opportunity-dependent inequality under uncertainty," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Jonathan D. Wren & Constantin Georgescu, 2022. "Detecting anomalous referencing patterns in PubMed papers suggestive of author-centric reference list manipulation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5753-5771, October.
    11. Martínez, Ricardo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2022. "An axiomatic approach towards pandemic performance indicators," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Aldo Gardini & Enrico Fabrizi & Carlo Trivisano, 2022. "Poverty and inequality mapping based on a unit‐level log‐normal mixture model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2073-2096, October.
    13. Dennis Fixler & Marina Gindelsky & David Johnson, 2020. "Measuring Inequality in the National Accounts," BEA Working Papers 0175, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    14. Qing Feng & Dengfeng Li & Guichuan Zhou & Zhibin Wu, 2024. "Fairness based unique common equilibrium efficient frontier for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 427-449, October.
    15. Francisco Cardoso, Ben-Hur & Gonçalves, Sebastián & Iglesias, José Roberto, 2023. "Why equal opportunities lead to maximum inequality? The wealth condensation paradox generally solved," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2024. "Value Judgements, Positivism and Utility Comparisons in Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 423-437, January.
    17. Elin Halvorsen & Thor O. Thoresen, 2021. "Distributional Effects of a Wealth Tax under Lifetime‐Dynastic Income Concepts," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 123(1), pages 184-215, January.
    18. Hedtrich, Johannes & Aßmann, Christian & Henning, Christian, 2018. "Key Sectors - Key Policies: Challenges on Estimating and Validating a Policy-Impact Function," Conference papers 332937, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Dhital, Saroj & Jiang, Senyuan & Reese, Jillian, 2023. "Effects of monetary and government spending policy on economic inequality," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Schieferdecker, David & Reinhardt, Susanne & Mijs, Jonathan & Silva, Graziella Moraes & Teeger, Chana & Carvalhaes, Flavio & Seekings, Jeremy, 2024. "Everyday conversations about economic inequality: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125293, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inequality indices; income distribution; information theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:new:wpaper:2211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Setterfield (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/denewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.