IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/33455.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ESG Is The Most Polarizing Nonwage Amenity: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuele Colonnelli
  • Timothy McQuade
  • Gabriel Ramos
  • Thomas Rauter
  • Olivia Xiong

Abstract

We examine job-seekers' heterogeneous preferences for nonwage amenities, with a focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices, using an incentivized field experiment in Brazil. Our findings reveal that ESG is the most polarizing nonwage amenity across multiple sociodemographic groups, with the strongest preferences observed among highly educated, white, and politically liberal individuals (Colonnelli et al., 2025). While women report a stronger preference for work-from-home policies, all other nonwage amenities exhibit minimal variation across sociodemographic groups. Our findings highlight the critical role of corporate values in shaping economic outcomes within an increasingly polarized society.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuele Colonnelli & Timothy McQuade & Gabriel Ramos & Thomas Rauter & Olivia Xiong, 2025. "ESG Is The Most Polarizing Nonwage Amenity: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Brazil," NBER Working Papers 33455, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33455
    Note: AP CF DEV LE LS PE POL PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w33455.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G0 - Financial Economics - - General
    • J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.