IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/33007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating the Regional Welfare Impact of Tariff Changes: Application to the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Robert C. Feenstra
  • Chang Hong

Abstract

We propose an empirical method using a translog expenditure function to estimate the regional welfare impact of changes in import tariffs, and we apply this method to the United States. Tariff revenue is assumed to be distributed on a per-capita basis, so states with greater production will experience a welfare gain from tariffs on those products (due to rising producer surplus) while those with little production will lose (due to falling consumer surplus). Over 2002-17, we find that 28 states benefitted from reduced tariffs, with national welfare gains of $5.8 billion or $50 per household in 2017. These national gains were eliminated by the tariff increases after 2017, with national losses of $57 per household in 2019 and rising to $103 per household in 2022, but 25 states still gained. These estimates of the national losses from tariff increases are lower than found in other studies for the 2017-19 period, due to this study incorporating product exclusions that reduced the tariffs on certain products and also due to differences in the methods of calculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert C. Feenstra & Chang Hong, 2024. "Estimating the Regional Welfare Impact of Tariff Changes: Application to the United States," NBER Working Papers 33007, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33007
    Note: ITI
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w33007.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.