IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/29859.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Syndicated Lending, Competition and Relative Performance Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Schneider
  • Philip Strahan
  • Jun Yang

Abstract

Relative performance evaluation (RPE) intensifies competitive pressure by tying executive compensation to the profits of rivals. We show that these contracts make loan syndication harder by reducing banks’ willingness to participate in loans underwritten by banks named in their RPE contracts. Lead arranger banks which are more frequently named in RPE hold larger shares of the loans they syndicate, and their borrowers face higher spreads. These banks, in turn, lose market share to banks less likely to be named in RPE. Our results highlight the tension between the normal benefits of competition versus the need for cooperation in loan syndication.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Schneider & Philip Strahan & Jun Yang, 2022. "Syndicated Lending, Competition and Relative Performance Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 29859, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29859
    Note: CF
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29859.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.