IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/10178.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

WTO Dispute Settlements in East Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Dukgeun Ahn

Abstract

East Asian countries have become much more active in utilizing the WTO dispute settlement system to assert their legal rights. The dispute settlement experience so far for these countries has shown strong tendency of domestic governments to defend economic interest of major industries. Their primary counterparts in trade disputes are still major developed countries such as the United States and the European Communities. Thailand is in some sense peculiar in that it brought disproportionately many complaints to the WTO dispute settlement system while it was hardly challenged by other Members. In contrast to the GATT era, Korea has become legally very aggressive under the WTO system. It is also noted that Japan has been rarely challenged since October 1998. Except for China, most East Asian countries lack the national procedure to link private economic interests to the WTO dispute settlement procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Dukgeun Ahn, 2003. "WTO Dispute Settlements in East Asia," NBER Working Papers 10178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10178
    Note: ITI
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10178.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason E. Kearns & Steve Charnovitz, 2002. "Adjudicating Compliance in the WTO: A Review of DSU Article 21.5," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 331-352, July.
    2. Kim, Hyun Chong, 1999. "The WTO Dispute Settlement Process: A Primer," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 457-476, September.
    3. Dukgeun Ahn, 2003. "Korea in the GATT-WTO Dispute Settlement System: Legal Battle for Economic Development," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 597-633, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dukgeun Ahn, 2005. "WTO Dispute Settlements in East Asia," NBER Chapters, in: International Trade in East Asia, pages 287-328, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ichiro Araki, 2006. "The Evolution of Japan's Aggressive Legalism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 783-803, June.
    3. Dussel Peters, Enrique, 2005. "Economic opportunities and challenges posed by China for Mexico and Central America," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 8, number 8, March.
    4. Bark, Taeho & Kang, Moonsung, 2011. "Asia’s Strategic Participation in the Group of 20 for Global Economic Governance Reform: From the Perspective of International Trade," Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 74, Asian Development Bank.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dukgeun Ahn, 2005. "WTO Dispute Settlements in East Asia," NBER Chapters, in: International Trade in East Asia, pages 287-328, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. V N Balasubramanyam & C F Elliott, 2002. "Competition policy and the WTO," Working Papers 539974, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    3. Dennis Browne, 2005. "Dispute Settlement in the WTO: How Friendly Is It for the LDC," CPD Working Paper 45, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    4. Serrano Caballero, Enriqueta & Ojo, Marianne, 2019. "Trade Negotiations and Global Relations: Emerging Players and Actors," MPRA Paper 92105, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.