IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/wpsorb/bla00051.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Importance of the Bidder Motive in the Wealth Effect of Takeovers

Author

Listed:
  • Constance Phelizon

    (TEAM - Université Paris 1, CNRS)

Abstract

Event studies on shareholder wealth effects of American and French takeovers find out that targets clearly gain, and bidders do not lose. We estimate in this study the abnormal returns associated with takeovers in the French market during the period of intense acquisition activity of 1991-1997. We find out the classic result that takeovers contribute to an increase in the target expected profitability but yields no short-term profits for the bidder. We improve these finfings further by testing the hypotheses of the literature accounting for wealth creation associated with takeovers. We put ahead the importance of the bidder motive for the target expected value. Actually, operations that were not industrially justified by the development of the bidder activity, either by the expansion of its productive capacity or by its vertical integration, were found to generate non-significant abnormal returns. These findings seem to support the synergy hypothesis. Nevertheless we do not solve the bidder enigma, as long as industrially justified takeover abnormal returns remain unsignificant for this subsample

Suggested Citation

  • Constance Phelizon, 2000. "The Importance of the Bidder Motive in the Wealth Effect of Takeovers," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques bla00051, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    • Handle: RePEc:mse:wpsorb:bla00051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03774133
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franks, Julian & Harris, Robert & Titman, Sheridan, 1991. "The postmerger share-price performance of acquiring firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 81-96, March.
    2. Malatesta, Paul H. & Thompson, Rex, 1985. "Partially anticipated events: A model of stock price reactions with an application to corporate acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 237-250, June.
    3. Bernard, Vl, 1987. "Cross-Sectional Dependence And Problems In Inference In Market-Based Accounting Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 1-48.
    4. Fama, Eugene F, et al, 1969. "The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Ruback, Richard S., 1983. "The market for corporate control : The scientific evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1-4), pages 5-50, April.
    6. Collins, Dw & Dent, Wt, 1984. "A Comparison Of Alternative Testing Methodologies Used In Capital-Market Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 48-84.
    7. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    8. Ellert, James C, 1976. "Mergers, Antitrust Law Enforcement and Stockholder Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 31(2), pages 715-732, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constance Phelizon, 2000. "The Importance of the Bidder Motive in the Wealth Effect of Takeovers [L'impact des offres publiques sur la richesse des actionnaires : une étude des anticipations des agents selon le motif du rach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03774133, HAL.
    2. Constance Phelizon, 2000. "The Importance of the Bidder Motive in the Wealth Effect of Takeovers [L'impact des offres publiques sur la richesse des actionnaires : une étude des anticipations des agents selon le motif du rach," Post-Print halshs-03774133, HAL.
    3. Martynova, Marina & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2148-2177, October.
    4. Martynova, M., 2006. "The market for corporate control and corporate governance regulation in Europe," Other publications TiSEM 8651e281-4914-41f2-ac14-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Constance Phélizon, 2001. "L'impact des offres publiques sur la richesse des actionnaires : une étude des anticipations des agents selon le motif de l'acquisition," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 61(1), pages 139-152.
    6. Taher Hamza, 2009. "La performance à court et à long terme de l'acquéreur:l'impact de la détention d'une position de contrôle," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 12(1), pages 33-65, March.
    7. Mohamed-Larbi Aribou, 2017. "Fusions-acquisitions et création de valeur : Bilan des recherches et perspectives d'évolution," Post-Print hal-01468250, HAL.
    8. Atkas, Nihat & Bodt, Eric de & Roll, Richard, 2001. "Market Response to European Regulation," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt0qc9p8gf, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    9. Kanungo, Rama Prasad, 2021. "Uncertainty of M&As under asymmetric estimation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 774-793.
    10. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    11. Martynova, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2005. "Takeover Waves : Triggers, Performance and Motives," Discussion Paper 2005-029, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    12. Shams, Syed M.M. & Gunasekarage, Abeyratna & Colombage, Sisira R.N., 2013. "Does the organisational form of the target influence market reaction to acquisition announcements? Australian evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 89-108.
    13. Amporn SOONGSWANG, 2012. "Do M&A Enhance Values? Mixed Methods And Evidence," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 7(3(21)/ Fa), pages 312-325.
    14. Madhumita Chakraborty, 2010. "The Wealth Effects of Takeover Announcement for Firms in the Financial Services Sector in India," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 9(2), pages 199-227, August.
    15. Corrado, Charles J. & Truong, Cameron, 2008. "Conducting event studies with Asia-Pacific security market data," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 493-521, November.
    16. Drakos, Konstantinos, 2004. "Terrorism-induced structural shifts in financial risk: airline stocks in the aftermath of the September 11th terror attacks," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 435-446, June.
    17. Doan, Minh Phuong & Sercu, Piet, 2021. "Modelling multiperiod patterns in stock-market reactions to events, with an application to serial acquisitions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Daniel Martin Katz & Michael J Bommarito II & Tyler Soellinger & James Ming Chen, 2015. "Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making," Papers 1508.05751, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    19. Azhar Mohamad, 2017. "Seeking Negative Alphas Through Shorting," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1488-1506, December.
    20. Gunther Tichy, 2001. "What Do We Know about Success and Failure of Mergers?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 347-394, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Takeovers; Industrial Synergies; Event Study Methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:wpsorb:bla00051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/msep1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.