IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/cesdoc/17053.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Blockchain Publique versus Blockchain Privée : Enjeux et Limites

Author

Abstract

La blockchain est un sujet très prisé dans le milieu bancaire et de l'assurance, de quoi s'agit-il ? La notion de blockchain émane de la cryptographie et il s'agit d'un protocole permettant de transmettre des informations de manière sécurisée. Nous distinguerons deux approches, l'approche publique décentralisée et l'approche privée centralisée. Le concept de blockchain est apparu grâce à l'émergence de crypto-monnaie et en particulier du Bitcoin. Si la blockchain doit devenir un outil important au sein des banques alors il est nécessaire d'avoir une connaissance assez juste des outils sous-jacents et des enjeux associés à cette nouvelle technologie. En effet, il apparait nécessaire d'identifier les risques qui y sont associés et de proposer des stratégies en vue de les contrôler

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Guegan, 2017. "Blockchain Publique versus Blockchain Privée : Enjeux et Limites," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17053, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    • Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:17053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/CES2017/17053.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain; Bitcoin; régulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:17053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenp1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.