IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/cesdoc/16020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sérier pour révéler une norme de comportement institutionnel : analyse croisée de trois juridictions

Author

Abstract

This article considers, from a methodological point of view, the way statistical analysis is used in both history and economics approaches, by comparing threee researches on french judicial data. These three projects differ according to the period considered (Middle age / nowadays), the jurisdiction studied (the royal Châtelet court / lawyers disciplinary courts / family law), and the scientific discipline they are attached to. However, they share the purpose of highlighting, through individual data considered as series, the norm of behavior of a judicial institution. This identical aim allows to compare the methodological choices of each research. Even for the contemporary time researches, this purpose indeed deprives the researcher from any ready-made database. More than the academic fields, this lack of information explains the methodological choices made in the seriation process both with the specificities of the institutional contexts studied. Moreover, the methodological routines followed when inferential statistics come into play reflect various conceptions of the articulation between theoretical models and empirical data, which go beyond the frontiers of both academic fields

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Chaserant & Julie Claustre & Agnès Gramain, 2016. "Sérier pour révéler une norme de comportement institutionnel : analyse croisée de trois juridictions," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16020, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    • Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:16020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/CES2016/16020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Duée & Cyril Rebillard & Jérôme Wittwer & Agnès Gramain, 2007. "Les contributions privées au financement de la dépendance dans le cadre de l'obligation alimentaire : pratiques judiciaires et implications distributives," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 177(1), pages 35-54.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1722 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Franck Bessis & Camille Chaserant & Olivier Favereau & Sophie Harnay & Silvia Pietrini, 2013. "Régulations professionnelles et pluralisme juridique : une analyse économique de la profession d’avocat," Working Papers halshs-01278348, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnès Gramain & Jérôme Wittwer, 2010. "Prise en charge des personnes âgées dépendantes : quels enjeux économiques ?," Post-Print halshs-00705568, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8390 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5866 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    statistical methodology; data; norm; jurisdiction; history; economics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • N01 - Economic History - - General - - - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods
    • N40 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:16020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenp1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.