IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mrr/papers/wp478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Security’s Role in Economic Security: Evidence and Insight from an Analysis of Multiprogram Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Jessie Coe

    (RAND Corporation)

  • Kathryn Anne Edwards

    (RAND Corporation)

  • Daniel Schwam

    (RAND Corporation)

Abstract

We use the 2014 and 2018 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation to assess multiprogram participation — the number of public programs or subsidies that an individual is a beneficiary of at a given time. Our aim is to understand the combined reach of the 16 programs that constitute the country’s social welfare system. We start by mapping participation across age and income groups, and then use regressions to identify what predicts participation or lack of participation among those same groups. We end with a comparison of household income shares from private income, from all public benefits aside from Social Security, and benefits from Social Security. There is no normative assessment of whether more program participation is good or bad, however, we do find evidence of a fractured system and Social Security as a bedrock of household income among the poor.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessie Coe & Kathryn Anne Edwards & Daniel Schwam, 2023. "Social Security’s Role in Economic Security: Evidence and Insight from an Analysis of Multiprogram Participation," Working Papers wp478, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:mrr:papers:wp478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp478.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mrr:papers:wp478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MRRC Administrator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isumius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.