IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mrr/papers/wp477.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mixed-methods Study on Work-disabled Adults Who Do Not Apply for Social Security Disability Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Lila Rabinovich

    (University of Southern California Center for Economic and Social Research)

  • Doerte U. Junghaenel

    (University of Southern California Center for Economic and Social Research)

  • Tabasa Ozawa

    (University of Southern California Center for Economic and Social Research)

Abstract

Take-up gaps in safety net programs, which have been long documented in the United States and elsewhere, are an important policy question as nontake-up compromises the equity objectives and efficacy of programs. The Social Security Disability program is an example of this: More than 20 million adults report a work disability, but only around 11 million currently receive disability benefits through the Social Security Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income programs. This comprehensive mixed-methods study examines the characteristics and decision-making around benefits applications among adults with self-reported work disability who have never applied for disability benefits. Analysis of survey data suggests that the availability of personal and socioeconomic resources, including younger age, educational attainment, spousal support, and income may act as buffers to feeling the need to apply for disability benefits. Greater cognitive resources, in particular quantitative and verbal reasoning skills, were associated with a greater likelihood of not applying. Qualitatively, we find that high transaction costs involved in disability applications coupled with the widespread perception of low approval rates may be a critical deterrent for eligible individuals. Uncertain and lengthy medical processes after disability onset were also frequently reported as a central deterrent. Stigma about receiving disability benefits does not emerge as a factor in application behavior, although a change in self-concept involving an adjustment to benefit-receiving, work-disabled status was cited as a deterrent to claiming. These insights could inform targeted interventions to reduce barriers to take-up of benefits among potentially eligible adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Lila Rabinovich & Doerte U. Junghaenel & Tabasa Ozawa, 2023. "Mixed-methods Study on Work-disabled Adults Who Do Not Apply for Social Security Disability Benefits," Working Papers wp477, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:mrr:papers:wp477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp477.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mrr:papers:wp477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MRRC Administrator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isumius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.