IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/d637ad38ce7649ae84a7ddf061f044a2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Trusted Source of Information: How Systematic Reviews Can Support User Decisions About Adopting Evidence-Based Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Paulsell
  • Jaime Thomas
  • Shannon Monahan
  • Neil S. Seftor

Abstract

Systematic reviews sponsored by federal departments or agencies play an increasingly important role in disseminating information about evidence-based programs and have become a trusted source of information for administrators and practitioners seeking evidence-based programs to implement.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Paulsell & Jaime Thomas & Shannon Monahan & Neil S. Seftor, "undated". "A Trusted Source of Information: How Systematic Reviews Can Support User Decisions About Adopting Evidence-Based Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d637ad38ce7649ae84a7ddf06, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:d637ad38ce7649ae84a7ddf061f044a2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0193841X16665963
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob Alex Klerman, 2017. "Editor in Chief’s Comment: External Validity in Systematic Reviews," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(5), pages 391-402, October.
    2. Brian Goesling & Sarah Oberlander & Lisa Trivits, 2017. "High-Stakes Systematic Reviews," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 27-49, February.
    3. Lawarée, Justin & Jacob, Steve & Ouimet, Mathieu, 2020. "A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Pamela R. Buckley & Abigail A. Fagan & Fred C. Pampel & Karl G. Hill, 2020. "Making Evidence-Based Interventions Relevant for Users: A Comparison of Requirements for Dissemination Readiness Across Program Registries," Evaluation Review, , vol. 44(1), pages 51-83, February.
    5. Neil Seftor, 2017. "Raising the Bar," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(3), pages 212-239, June.
    6. Tamara M. Haegerich & Corinne David-Ferdon & Rita K. Noonan & Brian J. Manns & Holly C. Billie, 2017. "Technical Packages in Injury and Violence Prevention to Move Evidence Into Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 78-108, February.
    7. Jessica Harding & Jean Knab & Susan Zief & Kevin Kelly & Diana McCallum, "undated". "A Systematic Review of Programs to Promote Aspects of Teen Parents’ Self-Sufficiency: Supporting Educational Outcomes and Healthy Birth Spacing," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 05e656f1b4a54dae83654795b, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:d637ad38ce7649ae84a7ddf061f044a2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.