IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/cd9941b6b7374f3ba38fd30aa535e23a.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perceptions of Electronic Health Records and Their Effect on the Quality of Care: Results from a Survey of Patients in Four States

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Zurovac
  • Stacy Dale
  • Martha Kovac

Abstract

Using data from patients surveyed after primary care provider visits, this working paper found patients had favorable perceptions of electronic health records (EHRs). Patients believed that EHRs improved the quality of care, and most were not concerned with confidentiality of records.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Zurovac & Stacy Dale & Martha Kovac, "undated". "Perceptions of Electronic Health Records and Their Effect on the Quality of Care: Results from a Survey of Patients in Four States," Mathematica Policy Research Reports cd9941b6b7374f3ba38fd30aa, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:cd9941b6b7374f3ba38fd30aa535e23a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/ehr_perceptions.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy K. Lake & Tricia Collins Higgins & Paul B. Ginsburg, "undated". "Fostering Health Information Technology in Small Physician Practices: Lessons from Independent Practice Associations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 23df78217af7436ea470d809e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:7056 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:cd9941b6b7374f3ba38fd30aa535e23a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.