IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/b338a13880f44b87adbc9b13d6447680.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Are Some SSDI-Only Beneficiaries Poor? Insights from the National Beneficiary Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Gina Livermore
  • Maura Bardos

Abstract

This brief describes characteristics, health status, living arrangements, and income sources of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)-only beneficiaries who meet the federal definition of poor, compared with those who live in higher-income households.

Suggested Citation

  • Gina Livermore & Maura Bardos, "undated". "Why Are Some SSDI-Only Beneficiaries Poor? Insights from the National Beneficiary Survey," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b338a13880f44b87adbc9b13d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:b338a13880f44b87adbc9b13d6447680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/disability/ssdi_poverty_drc_brief.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jack Gettens & Alexis Henry, "undated". "Making Ends Meet: How Low-Income DI Beneficiaries Meet Their Needs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 074a72cac45146fdbd8db37e1, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Jody Schimmel Hyde & Sarah Croake & Alex Bryce & Matt Messel, "undated". "Developing Income-Related Statistics on Federal Disability Beneficiaries Using Nationally Representative Survey Data," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d3e78f0fc4454593b6b8ea18d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Jack Gettens & Alexis Henry, "undated". "Making Ends Meet: How Low-Income Social Security Disability Insurance Beneficiaries Meet Their Needs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 91b122149f084708a520f9d46, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SSI; SSDI; poverty; Social Security; disability;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:b338a13880f44b87adbc9b13d6447680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.