Alternative Student Growth Measures for Teacher Evaluation: Implementation Experiences of Early-Adopting Districts
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:mpr:mprres:7897 is not listed on IDEAS
- Brian Gill & Julie Bruch & Kevin Booker, 2013. "Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 85b7a88ce0cf4597a7efd7a21, Mathematica Policy Research.
- repec:mpr:mprres:8119 is not listed on IDEAS
- Brian Gill & Brittany English & Joshua Furgeson & Moira McCullough, "undated". "Alternative Student Growth Measures for Teacher Evaluation: Profiles of Early-Adopting Districts," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 75a6f8ad56364762acf38c648, Mathematica Policy Research.
- repec:mpr:mprres:8118 is not listed on IDEAS
- Brian Gill & Julie Bruch & Kevin Booker, 2013. "Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says (Executive Summary)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 40cb111baa964ce688821eb5a, Mathematica Policy Research.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Elias Walsh & Dallas Dotter & Albert Y. Liu, "undated". "Can More Teachers Be Covered? The Accuracy, Credibility, and Precision of Value-Added Estimates with Proxy Pre-Tests," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c61e6b4de71b4741b12bc978d, Mathematica Policy Research.
- Brian P. Gill & Jennifer S. Lerner & Paul Meosky, "undated". "Re-Imagining Accountability in K-12 Education: A Behavioral Science Perspective," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d0c19d0709b641259fe391b2e, Mathematica Policy Research.
More about this item
Keywords
teacher evaluation; teacher effectiveness; alternative assessment; high stakes test; student evaluation; curriculum based assessment; teacher expectations of students; teacher made tests; student educational objectives; case studies; student learning objectives; student growth measures; performance based assessment; value-added model;All these keywords.
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-EDU-2015-08-07 (Education)
- NEP-URE-2015-08-07 (Urban and Real Estate Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:8a9dfcb1bc6143608448114ea9b69d06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.