IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/7c4bfb55d1aa43d3a037f07820abce36.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Planning Section 1115 Demonstration Implementation to Enable Strong Evaluation Designs

Author

Listed:
  • James D. Reschovsky
  • Katharine Bradley

Abstract

This guide describes how states can plan the implementation of their section 1115 Medicaid demonstrations to enable rigorous evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • James D. Reschovsky & Katharine Bradley, "undated". "Planning Section 1115 Demonstration Implementation to Enable Strong Evaluation Designs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7c4bfb55d1aa43d3a037f0782, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7c4bfb55d1aa43d3a037f07820abce36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/2019/enable-strng-eval-dsgn-section-1115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James D. Reschovsky & Jessica Heeringa & Maggie Colby, "undated". "Selecting the Best Comparison Group and Evaluation Design: A Guidance Document for State Section 1115 Demonstration Evaluations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1c62af02c376466bbed3333eb, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kara Contreary & Katharine Bradley & Sandra Chao, "undated". "Best Practices in Causal Inference for Evaluations of Section 1115 Eligibility and Coverage Demonstrations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1814ed988b2f46d9bdfe25e93, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7c4bfb55d1aa43d3a037f07820abce36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.